<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Which do you prefer?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.divtype.com/what-do-you-prefer/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.divtype.com/what-do-you-prefer</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 18:45:54 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.divtype.com/what-do-you-prefer/comment-page-1#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 02:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.divtype.com/?p=75#comment-3</guid>
		<description>I know that doing &quot;inline&quot; CSS cuts down on white-space and that it loads faster, but I prefer to use the &quot;Dreamweaver&quot; approach. I find it easier to read and find the attribute that I&#039;m looking for. Admittedly, though, if an element only has 2 or 3 attributes on it, then I&#039;ll keep it inline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know that doing &#8220;inline&#8221; CSS cuts down on white-space and that it loads faster, but I prefer to use the &#8220;Dreamweaver&#8221; approach. I find it easier to read and find the attribute that I&#8217;m looking for. Admittedly, though, if an element only has 2 or 3 attributes on it, then I&#8217;ll keep it inline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
